"Brain Dead?" Don't Trust that Diagnosis

Brain dead means not dead.

Options: Read this just below.
Hear it on radio at rsr.org/brain-dead
Or watch it here via YouTube...

These real life examples of people who have recovered after being pronounced "brain dead" shows that doctors and hospitals are sometimes dead wrong:

  • Des Moines Blankety Blank Children's Hospital harvests the organs of living children, cuts out their eyes, etc.May 2015 - In Des Moines, Iowa as reported by USA Today, "Taylor's brain sank part way into her spinal canal. No one comes back from that, the doctors told Taylor's mother, Stacy, and her father, Chuck Hale. Nothing more could be done. Their daughter was brain dead. It was time to make arrangements to take her off life support and discuss organ donation. ...  Taylor Hale, considered brain dead by science, awoke from her coma. ... " So the staff doctors will harvest organs, cut out the eyes, etc., of living children at the Des Moines Blank Children's Hospital, hereafter known as Blankity Blank Hospital. See also this, this, this, this, and this.
  • January 2015 - George Pickering, a 27-year old Texan, was pronounced brain dead by doctors at the Tomball Regional Medical Center when his father threatened to shoot himself if anyone disconnected his son from life support. During the standoff with police, the son repeatedly squeezed his father's hand, and then woke up later that evening, has made a strong recovery, and in April was baptized after converting to Christianity.
  • March 2014 - A Mississippi man wasn't pronounced "brain" dead, but dead dead, and zippered into a sack, and shipped to the morgue, where he freaked out the workers by kicking his way out of the body bag just as they were ready to embalm him. Shesh. If multiple nurses and a coroner could get death so very wrong, one would hope that the medical industry could have more humility before God regarding patients who are noticably breathing.
  • July 2013 - A New York woman who was pronounced ‘brain dead’ by doctors unexpectedly awoke just as her organs were about to be removed for transplant.

NCI Researcher Now Admits Abortion/BC Link

National Cancer Institute Lead Researcher Reverses Herself
Now Admits Abortion/Breast Cancer Risk Factor

Updated June 2017 -- NCI Researcher Now Agrees: Louise A. Brinton, largely responsible for getting the government-funded NCI to deny the abortion-breast cancer link, has reversed herself and co-authored a new study which now describes significant breast cancer risk factors including "induced abortion."Nat'l Cancer Inst researcher admits abortion/breast cancer link "Specifically, older age, family history of breast cancer, earlier menarche age, induced abortion, and oral contraceptive use were associated with an increased risk for breast cancer," wrote Brinton and her co-authors in the peer-reviewed Cancer Epidemiology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. The study also says that these risk factors are "consistent with the effects observed in previous studies on younger women." (See "Risk Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer," Brinton, et al., American Association for Cancer Research.)

Second NCI Scientist to Confirm Abortion Link: "Pro-choice" Janet Daling has reported that "[A]mong women who had been pregnant at least once, the risk of breast cancer in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50 percent higher than among other women."

Endocrinologist Being Vindicated: Endocrinologist Dr. Joel Brind of Baruch College in New York City is the original dissenter at the NCI's conference that rejected the abortion link to breast cancer. In Dr. Brind's report on this NCI researcher's paper, read about another finding reported by Brinton, the 320% increase in risk for women taking the birth control pill to develop TNBC, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, a particularly aggressive and treatment-resistant cancer. Learn more also at AbortionBreastCancer.com and see a 2011 update regarding Johnson & Johnson below.

Endocrinologist Dr. Joel BrindHear Dr. Brind address these developments in the last few minutes of this Denver radio broadcast:

Another NCI-funded Research Admitted Link: Janet Daling, et al., in the Journal of the Nat'l Cancer Institute, earlier acknowledged that, "Among women who had been pregnant at least once, the risk of breast cancer in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50% higher than among other women... Our data support the hypothesis that an induced abortion can adversely influence a woman's subsequent risk of breast cancer." Daling is quoted in the L.A. Daily office@AmericanRTL.org. Thx! ">saying, "I would have loved to have found no association between breast cancer and abortion, but our research is rock solid and our data is accurate."

Nov. 2012 Update: Two more studies, as reported in the Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, on a combined group of more than 2,000 women, show induced abortion as a significant risk factor for breast cancer.

Mar. 2013 Update: Two more studies, from France and China, show that abortion greatly increases the risk of developing breast cancer. And class action lawsuits fly as Ms. Magazine reports on the many deaths from popular birth control pills. 

Aug. 2014 Update: A review of a dozen studies shows that the abortion breast cancer link explodes in Asia.

In Related News:

- Good News: Komen Arizona Shuts Down; October 2017 Race Canceled. By their abortion promotion, Komen actually increases breast cancer incidence. True hope against breast cancer is coming from rsr.org/targeted-antibodies and from efforts to abolish human abortion!

Colorado Right To Life Meets with Komen Race for the Cure Officials

For Immediate Release

Colorado Right To Life
To Join the Race for the Cure Protest

Denver, Colorado -- A meeting last Friday between Komen Breast Cancer Foundation's Denver officials, CRTL board members, and scientific and medical experts led the pro-life organization to decide to join an annual protest to warn women at the Komen Foundation's Race for the Cure of the link between abortion and breast cancer.

Komen/Planned Parenthood logoFormer Komen medical research analyst Eve Sanchez Silver explained to the Komen officials that she resigned from Komen two years ago because the organization denies the scientific studies showing the link between abortion and breast cancer, and it provides funding to abortion provider Planned Parenthood.  Professor Joel Brind, PhD endocrinologist from Baruch College in New York City attended the meeting after saying on Denver radio that, "the 2003 conference of the National Cancer Institute which denied abortion as a risk factor for breast cancer refused to allow attending scientists to present the opposing position of the scientific research establishing the link, showing that abortion was declassified as a cancer risk for political and not scientific reasons."

On the first Monday Trump woke in the White House

For the first Monday morning that Donald Trump woke up in the White House, the following full-page ad was delivered to his door in the Washington Times. Colorado Right To Life and American RTL urged Congress, the Supreme Court, and the new Trump administration to learn what is right and to do what is right, by the most innocent among us.

See the Trump ad in the context of the full edition of the Times, or see just click this tear sheet, or see the full text below.

The header of CRTL's full-page Wash Times ad to Donald Trump

See pro and con reactions to, "IF THERE IS NO GOD, President Trump..." on this CRTL page

Full Text:

President Trump, your abortion policy is fine.

But God exists. So your abortion policy is wrong.

Life of the Baby: We implore you to consider that on Judgment Day, God will take personally the intentional killing of every child. What this means for you is that on that day, with your own eyes President Trump, you will see each child killed under your abortion policy, every one of those boys and girls. What earthly historians write of your legacy will mean nothing compared to your eternal legacy, the one that you yourself are writing, and that God will read back to you. (The Bible you used to take your oath of office teaches this. See for example Revelation 20:12.)

Life of the Mother: A doctor's goal should never be to kill the mom to save the baby, nor to kill the child to save the mother. If a doctor can only save the mother and not the child also, that is a tragedy, but it is not criminal, unless the child is intentionally killed. When you've said that you have "exceptions", realize that "exception" means a child that you support killing. Unintentional, unavoidable, and accidental death is not the same as intentional killing. A physician should never postpone efforts to save the mother in order to take time out to kill the child, which is what George W. Bush supported with the absurd partial-birth abortion "exception". (American Right To Life further explains all this. Just Google: life of the mother, and you will find their article ranked #1.)

Kristi HofferberRape and Incest: It is wrong to kill a baby for the crime of his father. And we must never do wrong hoping that good might come of it (Romans 3:8). That always backfires. For example, abortion for incest is cruel. Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics cover up the crime of incest. Typically, they send the victim back home to her rapist. Even worse, they often send her home with her rapist, the same criminal who brought her to the clinic. Abortion for incest emboldens a criminal to rape his young relative, helps him escape being caught, tempts him to repeat his crime, and is not compassionate because it kills a baby and increases the mother's suffering. Kristi Hofferber, pictured at right, shares her real life case about her own father/grandfather. "The incest was published in 1991 when my biological mother prosecuted her father, for not only the one pregnancy resulting in my birth and adoption, but also for six other pregnancies resulting in five abortions, and one forced miscarry by her father." (See AmericanRTL.org/rape-and-incest to understand that the decision to not kill a baby is never a “hard case".)

Republican Party Abortion Legacy: Seeing ultrasounds of your children and grandchildren in the womb hasn't yet convinced you President Trump that every child should be protected by love and by law. So we are at a loss for how to help you. But for the sake of what is now our "First Family", we are trying. How might you extend the Republican abortion legacy? So far:

  • George W. Bush gave Planned Parenthood a billion dollars more than did Bill Clinton for a total of $2.2 billion.
  • ŸGeorge H.W. Bush instituted Title X funding which has given many billions to abortionists.
  • ŸRoe v. Wade itself was written by a Republican Justice and passed by five Republicans on the Supreme Court.

You have exploded "politics as usual". Where will you now bring this Republican legacy? For example, George W. Bush gave billions to Planned Parenthood even though for four years he had a historic trifecta of Republican control of 1) the Executive Branch, 2) of the House and Senate, and 3) even of the so-called Supreme Court. You will have the same power President Trump, but will be a far greater leader, if you stop the killing.

The Worst of Regulations: Regulations are strangling American business but abortion regulations strangle children. It is grotesquely immoral to reduce a child's God-given right to life to a second-tier negotiable issue, as is done with every well-intentioned but misguided abortion "regulation". All abortion regulations, like wait 24 hoursget informed consentanesthetize the fetus, end with, "and then you can kill the baby." Therefore they would keep abortion legal even if Roe v. Wade were merely overturned because they re-authorize the killing. Regulations not only backfire by making abortion seem more humane, they are immoral. (Please see AmericanRTL.org/abortion-regulations.)

 These Graphics Illustrate the Absurdity of Regulating Abortion

Meme: Urging ISIS absurdity of regulations